Home Portray Encouragement Literature News Download Learning Members Area Tools Touch It

Rajya Sabha passes SC/ST quota amendment bill in govt. promotions.

 New Delhi, Dec 17, 2012

Barring Samajwadi Party, an overwhelming majority in the Rajya Sabha passed the Bill that provides for quotas for SCs and STs in government job promotions. The constitution amendment Bill was approved by 194 members in the 245-strong House. Nine from Samajwadi Party and an independent voted against the Bill. The Bill is now likely to be introduced and moved for consideration and passing in Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The proposed legislation was the reason for the Lok Sabha being unable to transact any business during the day. While the Bill was being debated in Rajya Sabha, Samajwadi Party Members repeatedly disrupted the functioning of the Lok Sabha with party President Mulayam Singh Yadav, who has threatened to review support to the UPA, leading the protest in the House. In between adjournments, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath attempted to assuage Mr. Yadav’s apprehensions but to no avail. Congress MPs tried to counter the SP by raising counter slogans demanding the Bill be introduced in the Rajya Sabha at the earliest. In the Rajya Sabha, besides voting against the Bill, SP urged reservation in jobs for Muslims by referring to the Justice (Retd.) Rajender Sachar Committee report that said their plight was worse than that of Dalits. In his reply to the debate, Minister of State for Personnel V. Narayanasamy said the government had incorporated some elements like a 22 per cent cap on promotions for which consideration of Annual Confidential Report (ACR) will be crucial. Mr. Narayanasamy gave out figures to assert that discrimination against the SCs/STs and OBCs was rampant. He was amenable to Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley’s suggestion to ensure the amendments will not affect those who have already been promoted since 1995.   (The Hindu)

 

The Rajya Sabha tonight passed the Constitution amendment bill providing for quota for SCs and STs in government promotions by an overwhelming vote of 206 in the 245-member House. 10 votes went against the bill, which was strongly opposed by UPA ally Samajwadi Party.  They included nine SP members and an Independent Mohammed Adeeb. The Constitution (117th Amendment) Bill, 2012,  required two-third majority to be passed in the house. All four members of Shiv Sena, which also opposed the Bill, were not present in the House. The bill provides for reservation proportionate to population of SCs and STs against the backdrop of Supreme Court quashing such a decision of the Uttar Pradesh government earlier this year. Replying to the two-day debate, Minister of State for Personnel V Narayanasamy said the bill seeks to correct the “inadequacy” in representation of SCs/STs in higher positions in government jobs. To garner maximum support, government incorporated some crucial elements like 22 per cent cap on promotions for which consideration of Annual Confidential Report (ACR) will be crucial. Narayanasamy said quota in promotion existed since 1995 but the decision in the Indira Sawhney case put spokes in it. Noting that the Supreme Court has asked for quantifiable data on it, he said, “From our side we are convinced that they are backward per se. Government is committed to provide reservation in promotion. This is commitment of our government and the party. We are for SCs/STs and OBCs.” Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley sought an assurance from the government that the amendments will not affect people who have already been promoted since 1995. Narayanasamy replied that the government will write in this regard to state governments so that people who have been promoted are “not adversely affected”. The Bill provides for amendments to Article 16(4) of the Constitution that will allow states to reserve seats in promotion for SCs and STs without collecting data to show the backwardness of class and inadequacy of that class in public appointments. Samajwadi Party, which is strongly opposed to a bill asked the government to rethink on it, warning that it can have very serious fall-out and may be challenged in court.   (India TV News)

News Headlines